LONDON (Reuters) – British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson set out his plans for a “glorious” Brexit in a lengthy newspaper article on Saturday that angered colleagues and reignited speculation he would challenge Prime Minister Theresa May for the leadership of the Conservative party.
With May due to set out her vision for Brexit in a speech in the Italian city of Florence on Friday, Johnson published a 4,300-word article that roamed well beyond his ministerial brief and, in some cases, went beyond the approach set out by the government.
Britain, he said, would not pay to access European markets in the future. Once out of the European Union, the country should borrow to invest in infrastructure, reform the tax code and set immigration levels as it sees fit.
A prominent Brexit campaigner in last year’s referendum, Johnson also repeated the controversial claim that the government would be 350 million pounds better off per week once outside the EU.
”My friends, I must report that there are at least some people who are woefully underestimating this country,“ Johnson wrote in the Daily Telegraph. ”They think Brexit isn’t going to happen.
”I am here to tell you that this country will succeed in our new national enterprise, and will succeed mightily.
“We have a glorious future.”
A favorite with grassroots members of the Conservative Party, Johnson had been expected to challenge for the leadership after May gambled away her parliamentary majority in a June election she did not need to call.
Instead, he publicly pledged his loyalty. But the Times newspaper reported earlier this week that Johnson believed he had since been sidelined as May prepares to compromise over a divorce bill with the EU to ease the negotiations.
“We would not expect to pay for access to their markets any more than they would expect to pay for access to ours,” he wrote. The article made no reference to a transition period the government is expected to negotiate.
“And yes – once we have settled our accounts, we will take back control of roughly 350 million pounds per week,” he said. “It would be a fine thing, as many of us have pointed out, if a lot of that money went on the NHS (health service).”
Opposition Labour leader Jeremy…