TAGS: Marketing, Overseas
December 18, 2014
Eighteen U.S. Senators, representing states with significant agricultural economies, are firing back at Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross asking him to “conduct a robust economic analysis to evaluate how any changes to the North American Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA] would affect changes to the nation’s crop and livestock sectors.”
The letter follows Ross’ comment that potential damage to the U.S. ag sector by a withdrawal from NAFTA is an “empty threat.” Ross also has accused agriculture of complicating the NAFTA negotiations saying: “As one special interest group, say agriculture, for example, gets nervous, they start screaming and yelling publicly.” He said that reaction “complicates the environment” and “makes the negotiations harder.”
Ross’ comments were met with concern by many ag groups. “There was a collective eye roll among the agricultural community here in Washington, D.C., and also a lot of concern that the Secretary of Commerce, one of the key players in the overall trade discussions of this administration, is basically calling us a bunch of whiners and criers,” Colin Woodall of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association told Mike Adams of “AgriTalk” Radio. “That’s worrisome because we know what trade means for our industry. We know what a detriment it would be if we lose, not only NAFTA, but also possibly the South Korean Agreement. And for that to not be recognized by the Secretary of Commerce is a big problem.”
“The agriculture industry does not want to see momentum hindered especially at a time when net farm income has declined by approximately 50% over the past four years,” states the letter. “It is imperative that before any changes are made to NAFTA, or any other free-trade agreement, that economic analysis that illustrates the impact on the full supply chain of the industries involved be shared.
“With 95% of consumers residing outside of the U.S., farmers and ranchers must have access to export markets to sell their high-quality products. Free-trade agreements have allowed the U.S. agriculture industry to establish itself as a trusted supplier.
International markets have taken years to build, and it is imperative that no steps be taken to jeopardize these gains. We must continue to move the global presence of U.S. agricultural products forward, not backward. As the…