Would your caramel or mocha latte be affected by Seattle’s proposed sweet-beverage tax? A final City Council vote is expected Monday, but doubts remain about how the tax would work.
With a sweetened-beverage tax proposed for Seattle, most of the buzz has been about whether the tax would cover diet soda in addition to regular pop.
But the Emerald City isn’t known for soda pop — it’s known for coffee, including the sugar-charged lattes that have helped make Starbucks a worldwide superbrand.
So, what about the venti white-chocolate mocha your favorite barista makes just the way you like it, with soy milk and no whip? The idea behind the tax is to reduce consumption of sugary beverages. At Starbucks, that drink contains 66 grams of sugar — similar to a bottle of Coca-Cola.
Though the City Council is expected to take a final vote Monday, there are still doubts about how exactly the tax might affect made-to-order coffee drinks.
The latest plan calls for a tax of 1.75 cents per ounce on the distributors of sugary beverages and syrups used in beverages. The revenue — about $15 million annually to start out, would fund healthful-eating and education programs.
Bottled coffees, such as those made by Starbucks to be sold in stores, have from the start been included in the list of taxable drinks.
So have soda pop, sports and energy drinks such as Red Bull and Gatorade, some fruit drinks such as Sunny D and sweetened teas such as those sold by Arizona.
That changed in April, when Murray sent his legislation to the council. He was no longer exempting in-store prepared coffee beverages, along with baby formula, medicine and 100 percent fruit juices.
Instead, milk beverages would be…