Research shows school-based mental-health care improves students’ grades, attendance and reduces discipline. So why isn’t the Legislature making mental-health care part of its response to the McCleary ruling?
Tomas Garcia has broad shoulders, three earrings and fashionably ripped jeans. His appearance gives no indication there’s anything but good things ahead for the Roosevelt High School senior.
But by his own admission, he’s lucky to be at school. As a freshman, he sought out mental-health counseling at school when his parents separated, and again as a junior, when his rebellion was overtaking his studies.
“If I hadn’t come in here, I don’t think I’d be on track to graduate, to be honest,” said Garcia.
Garcia got help through an unusual health center located at Roosevelt. While some schools might have a nurse, Roosevelt’s clinic has four full-time staff positions. A pharmacy, primary medical care and mental-health therapy are just across the hall from the ceramics room. Services are free if kids need them.
This approach is extraordinarily rare. When it comes to student’s emotional health, Washington state’s school-funding model is parsimonious and badly behind the times.
Research by University of Washington professors on Seattle’s school-based medical centers found that students’ GPAs jumped when they got mental-health care. Absences for kids who repeatedly skipped class fell by 50 percent. Students of color are 21 times more likely to see a mental-health therapist in school than in a community clinic.
Research by Washington State University on the Spokane schools found a tight correlation between disciplinary incidents and child trauma, and a huge drop when schools recognized and addressed kids’ so-called Adverse Childhood Experiences.
For a school system looking for better outcomes, the return-on-investment for mental-health care is absurdly good.
Yet in Washington, there are just 975…