Graham-Cassidy bill: Readers weigh in

Attack on American public

I find it unbelievable that the Republicans in the Senate suppose that Americans will sit back and do nothing while they promote a bill that will take health care back to the Bush era (or worse).

Any rational politician would be working with every other Senator to make the Affordable Care Act more effective with more stable funding. The Graham-Cassidy bill does not do anything constructive and instead is a blatant partisan attack on the American public.

Lloyd Johnston, Seattle

Most Read Stories

Unlimited Digital Access. $1 for 4 weeks.

 

‘We can do much better’

I’m a single mom and full-time student. I pay close to $400 a month for health insurance. I am blessed to have amazing health. But what if I were to develop a disease or medical condition? I could not afford coverage with a pre-existing condition.

When will we, as a society, value the contribution of mothers, the self-employed and students? Is there a price tag to our health? Is there a price tag our contribution to this world?

The Graham-Cassidy bill does not honor humanity, community or innovation through personal enterprise. We can do much better as a whole.

Diana Jyoti, Shoreline

 

Make your voice heard

I find it beyond belief that the Republicans are trying to ram this bill through Congress again. They know how many people it will hurt. People will die because of this bill, and they don’t care. How can they do this to the people they represent? How can they live with themselves knowing the suffering this bill will cause? Please, anyone who agrees, stand with me against the Graham-Cassidy health care bill. Let’s make our voices heard.

Andrea Hawkins, Seattle

 

Single-payer is only solution

Regardless of the intentions of Congress, the president of the United States, the right, the left or those in between, health care should be available to all and should be consistent across state lines. One should be able to get the same level of coverage, same premiums, etc., and not have a geographical border dictate who lives and who dies.

The only solution on the horizon would be a single-payer system. But I guess that the for-profit insurance companies may differ.

Gee, maybe we aren’t so great after all.

Donna Johnson, Greenbank

 

Slow down, ask for citizens’  input

Since before Donald Trump was elected president, he and many members of Congress have been focused on repealing and…

Read the full article from the Source…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *