Court: Ohio rape convict can play football in Saturday game

A federal appeals court on Friday declined a university’s request to stop one of its football players convicted of rape as a teenager from playing on the team.

The ruling means Ma’lik Richmond, 21, will be allowed to play for Youngstown State University in a game against Central Connecticut State University on Saturday.

Youngstown State had asked the appeals court to throw out a Thursday night decision by U.S. District Judge Benita Pearson to temporarily allow Richmond to play football for Youngstown State for at least the next 14 days, including in the 2 p.m. game Saturday. Pearson scheduled a hearing Sept. 28 on whether to make the decision permanent.

Youngstown State appealed the decision Friday morning to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the appeals court dismissed it Friday afternoon.

Richmond, of Steubenville, sued Youngstown State this week after the school allowed him to join the football team as a walk-on and then told him he couldn’t play this season. Richmond is seeking reinstatement to the team’s active roster along with attorney fees and an unspecified amount of damages.

The university argued in its appeal that the school has a right to stop Richmond from playing to prevent campus protests and disruptions to the team.

“It is beyond harm to the University to have this temporary restraining order enforced,” the university said.

The appeals court, however, said Youngstown State failed to show that a temporary order allowing Richmond back on the team “has serious or irreparable consequences.”

No further appeal by the university is planned for now, said Dan Tierney, a spokesman for the Ohio Attorney General’s Office, which represents the university.

Richmond is pleased with the ruling, said Susan Stone, one of his attorneys.

“We’re very excited about Ma’lik going to the game tomorrow,” she said Friday afternoon.

During Thursday’s hearing, Stone argued the university was contractually obliged to allow Richmond to play so long as he followed university rules. She said the university hurt Richmond’s football career prospects by curtailing his exposure to professional scouts at the peak of his abilities, and that the order was necessary to prevent Richmond from losing any more playing time.

An attorney representing the university, Christina Corl, said the university didn’t violate any contractual obligations to Richmond because he didn’t take advantage of a school grievance procedure before filing his lawsuit.


Read the full article from the Source…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *