Blackwater murder conviction thrown out by US appeals court

A US appeals court has thrown out the murder conviction of one Blackwater guard and overturned the sentences of three others in connection with the killing of 14 Iraqis in 2007.

Nicholas Slatten, Paul Slough, Dustin Heard and Evan Liberty – former guards for Blackwater, a private military company contracted by the US State Department – were sentenced in 2015 for their involvement in the killings.

Mr Slough, Mr Heard, and Mr Liberty were sentenced to 30 years in prison for multiple counts of manslaughter, attempted manslaughter, and using firearms while committing a felony. Mr Slatten was sentenced to life in prison for murder.

Now, a US appeals court has thrown out Mr Slatten’s murder conviction, saying he should have been tried separately from his colleagues. The three-judge panel ordered a retrial, where Mr Slatten will be allowed to present previously inadmissable evidence.

The court also overturned the three other guards’ sentences, saying their length constituted “cruel and unusual punishment”.

The four guards formed part of a Blackwater convoy that travelled through Baghdad’s Nisour Square in 2007. In an effort to clear the square, the guards opened machine gun fire on the civilians gathered there. Witnesses described the scene as “awful” and “like a horror movie”. Fourteen Iraqis were killed, and 17 were injured.

The guards argue they were under fire from insurgents. No witness has supported this claim in trial.

Mr Slatten was convicted for the murder of a man driving a white Kia that pulled into the square. The government maintains that Mr Slatten’s shots ignited the chaos that ensued.

The court, however, pointed to testimony from Mr Slatten’s co-defendant saying he was not the one to fire the first shots. The testimony had been inadmissible at trial.

“The co-defendant’s statements … strike at the heart of that theory and instead point to the co-defendant, not Slatten, as the Blackwater convoy member who first ‘engaged and hit the driver’,” the court wrote.  

The decision renews a years-long court battle over the incident, which raised serious questions about the military’s accountability in Iraq.

The four guards were originally charged in 2008, but their convictions were overthrown after a judge ruled that prosecutors had used evidence inadmissible in court. The case was renewed by a federal appeal in 2013, and the men were…

Read the full article from the Source…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *